Re: [Patch] (revised patch) / 0 should send SIGFPE not SIGTRAP

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 11 Jun 2004, David Daney wrote:
> David Daney wrote:
> > How about the attached (lightly tested) patch?
> >
> I will quit sending patches after this one.  It is equivalent to the
> previous version, except it uses the symbolic names of the break codes
> instead of the numeric values.

Please send one more, where you use `diff -up' :-)

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

						Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
							    -- Linus Torvalds


[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux