On Sat, 24 Apr 2004, Ralf Baechle wrote: > > > Yeah. The weirdness is not in that part; what's weird is placing the rest > > > of memory somewhere else. > > > > Perhaps to be able to put iomem stuff in CKSEG1 without implying a hole > > in the RAM. > > The machine is running a 64-bit kernel so likely it was designed with > little consideration for 32-bit issues. Well, the exception arrangement requires RAM starting from the physical address 0. It seems natural to place RAM just there, avoiding additional complexity to address decoders. But then firmware has to be somewere around 0x1fc00000, so to support more than 508MB of RAM the designers would have to create a hole in RAM, which would have to be handled by the OS then. Thus abandoning the idea of putting RAM low, placing it somewhere above 0x1fffffff and just mapping some of it at 0 for the exceptions seems a better solution. Fortunately everything is not a PC. :-) -- + Maciej W. Rozycki, Technical University of Gdansk, Poland + +--------------------------------------------------------------+ + e-mail: macro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, PGP key available +
