Re: IP30 goes relatively far now

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>  I must have been blind -- there's a matching ".set pop" elsewhere.  Is a 
> "nop" really missing in the output?  I've assembled the file and I can't 
> see any problem:
> 
> 000000000000022c <handle_daddi_ov_int>:
>  22c:	0c000000 	jal	0 <except_vec0_generic>
> 			22c: R_MIPS_26	do_daddi_ov
> 			22c: R_MIPS_NONE	*ABS*
> 			22c: R_MIPS_NONE	*ABS*
>  230:	03a0202d 	move	a0,sp
>  234:	08000000 	j	0 <except_vec0_generic>
> 			234: R_MIPS_26	ret_from_exception
> 			234: R_MIPS_NONE	*ABS*
> 			234: R_MIPS_NONE	*ABS*
>  238:	00000000 	nop
>  23c:	00000000 	nop

Oooh, it's SOOO strange!

For me, it is:

   ...
 228:   03a0202d        move    a0,sp
 22c:   0c000000        jal     0 <except_vec0_generic>
                        22c: R_MIPS_26  do_daddi_ov
                        22c: R_MIPS_NONE        *ABS*
                        22c: R_MIPS_NONE        *ABS*
 230:   08000000        j       0 <except_vec0_generic>
                        230: R_MIPS_26  ret_from_exception
                        230: R_MIPS_NONE        *ABS*
                        230: R_MIPS_NONE        *ABS*

because the last '.set *reorder' before is in 'nmi_handler', and it is a
'.set noreorder'. I will get a newer kernel (I did 2.6.1 because it worked
for me, and 2.6.3 crashed on my PC with astonishing frequency, so I didn't
want to take a chance) and check.

Anyway, the procedure is 'handle_daddi_ov' and not 'handle_daddi_ov_int'
in my genex.S, and it's substantially longer than your code. Do you have
the SAVE_ALL there? I don't see it.

Yours,

Stanislaw Skowronek




[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux