Re: BUG in pcnet32.c?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 10:27:56AM +0200, Brian Murphy wrote:

> >The more information BUG or BUG_ON provide the bigger the kernel gets.
> >Using a simple break instruction was simply the smallest thing.  The
> >previous, just slightly more verbose BUG() implementation did result
> >in ~ 87k of bloat ...
> > 
> >
> Perhaps you could mention this usage of break explicitly in the message 
> in do_bp.

That's easy, BUG() and BUG_ON() if the condition was met use a break
instruction.

  Ralf


[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux