Ralf Baechle wrote: > On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 01:50:27PM +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > > > Some picky firmware may be unhappy about a bit different ELF layout it > > yields. Anyway, this is the right way to go and any problems with bad > > firmware may be able to be compensated with updates to our linker scripts. > > I've had lots of trouble with ECOFF implementations but not with ELF > which is a nicer design - in particular the obvious way of implementing > ELF loading is even likely to be the right one. Well, some people chose to analyse ELF sections for their boot loader as the "obvious" way... > Oh well, we'll see - and I guess a binutils person will object to obove > paragraph the next five minutes ;-) Am I still in time? ;-) Thiemo
