At Wed, 17 Mar 2004 17:18:37 +0100 (CET), Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > Well, I think this can be handled by creating an artificial processor > entry (e.g. "PROCESSOR_MIPS64R2" in this case) and replacing it with a > real one once an implementation is publicly available. yeah. doing that, but introducing known "to be removed" code bugs me. it's probably better than not getting the rest of the infrastructure in, though. cgd
