Re: [PATCH 2.6] missing _raw_write_trylock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 09:50:00AM -0800, Jun Sun wrote:
> > Are you going to do a non-LLSC, or are we no longer concerned about
> > those?
> > 
> 
> For SMP machines we assume LLSC are present.  This function and its friends 
> for SMP only.

doesn't CONFIG_PREEMPT (*shudder*) need it is aswell?



[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux