On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 04:11:32PM -0800, Indigodfw wrote: > Well, is not that what we want? > That is, we want to load (using ll) from &v->counter. > > Should not the code have been > ll %0, 0(%1) > where %1 is "=m" (&v->counter) No, it would be ll %0, %1. The result of an m constraint will be a register-and-offset term like 0($13) or 256($13). -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
