On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 03:09:12PM +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Dimitri Torfs wrote: > > > > It took a bit longer than I planned, sorry. Anyway, here are two > > > functionally equivalent patches, for 2.4 and the head, that remove an ISA > > > specification if a tool supports "-march=" and "-mabi=" at the same time. > > > Please try the appropriate one. > > > > Tried the head one, it had some typos (patch follows). Unfortunately, as I wrote > > Oops, thanks for the correction -- as I still have only gcc 2.95.4, I > wasn't able to see the typos immediately. > > > earlier, gcc-3.2 doesn't set the ISA correctly when using -march=, so > > it doesn't work for 3.2. > > But do we care of the ISA? I don't think so -- it's just a leftover from > the days the MIPS world was less complicated. If gcc 3.2 correctly emits > code for the selected processor and obeys the selected ABI, then > everything is fine. Are the binaries correct? If so, I'd like to apply > the patch. I actually had problems compiling when the -mips3 was not set. The compiler choked on compiling some empty file, if I remember correctly. I will try again later to see what exactly went wrong. Dimitri -- Dimitri Torfs | NSCE dimitri@sonycom.com | The Corporate Village tel: +32 2 7008541 | Da Vincilaan 7 - D1 fax: +32 2 7008622 | B-1935 Zaventem - Belgium
