Re: [2.6 patch] fix DECSTATION depends

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Ralf Baechle wrote:

> >  Going back to the subject -- what's the problem with dependencies?
> 
> Nothing.  It was looking like you meant something else and me and Adrian
> got trapped by that.  Feel free to change it back to what it was but
> maybe "depends on MIPS32 || (MIPS64 && EXPERIMENTAL)" is less ambigous?

 I thought the construct triggered a problem elsewhere and the change was
supposed to work it around.  I'm pretty surprised you've forgotten I
ported the DECstation code to 64 bits -- it's already over a year and a
half since I did the first boot.

 I feel a bit hesitant about changing the expression, but perhaps I may
add a comment to the help text, on why it's experimental for 64-bit.  I
suspect hardly anyone will notice, though -- if built with unpatched tools
and run on a problematic processor the kernel complains and refuses to run
asking to contact <linux-mips@linux-mips.org> and nobody did that yet...

  Maciej

-- 
+  Maciej W. Rozycki, Technical University of Gdansk, Poland   +
+--------------------------------------------------------------+
+        e-mail: macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl, PGP key available        +


[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux