Re: How stable is 2.6 on a SB1250 processor?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I think userland is still broken. Ralf was working on the access_ok
problem the last time I talked to him.

Pete

On Tue, 2004-01-13 at 13:03, Kevin Paul Herbert wrote:
> I'm working on bringing up the 2.6 kernel on a board using the SB1250
> processor, and I have a problem in userland that I'm wondering if anyone
> else has seen.
> 
> I built a simple test program for userland, which just uses the write()
> syscall to say hello world. This is statically linked, and it works
> under a 2.4 kernel. Under 2.6, I get no output. My guess is that an
> exception is occuring, the signal gets back to my test program, and it
> is looping.
> 
> I've written a simple assembly language hello world program which does
> the exact same thing... write() syscall and I get my hello world.
> 
> My next task is to get kgdb working on this board so I can do some
> better debugging, but I was wondering if anyone else has seen this
> problem, or for that matter whether the SB1 processor support is
> expected to work at all.
> 
> Thanks for any help,
> 
> Kevin
> 



[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux