As promised. Not any different, really. Index: arch/mips/kernel/scall64-64.S =================================================================== RCS file: /home/cvs/linux/arch/mips/kernel/scall64-64.S,v retrieving revision 1.9 diff -u -p -r1.9 scall64-64.S --- arch/mips/kernel/scall64-64.S 10 Oct 2003 22:58:55 -0000 1.9 +++ arch/mips/kernel/scall64-64.S 4 Dec 2003 16:49:22 -0000 @@ -92,6 +92,8 @@ syscall_trace_entry: ld a1, PT_R5(sp) ld a2, PT_R6(sp) ld a3, PT_R7(sp) + ld a4, PT_R8(sp) + ld a5, PT_R9(sp) jalr t2 li t0, -EMAXERRNO - 1 # error? Index: arch/mips/kernel/scall64-n32.S =================================================================== RCS file: /home/cvs/linux/arch/mips/kernel/scall64-n32.S,v retrieving revision 1.6 diff -u -p -r1.6 scall64-n32.S --- arch/mips/kernel/scall64-n32.S 10 Oct 2003 22:58:55 -0000 1.6 +++ arch/mips/kernel/scall64-n32.S 4 Dec 2003 16:49:24 -0000 @@ -89,6 +89,8 @@ n32_syscall_trace_entry: ld a1, PT_R5(sp) ld a2, PT_R6(sp) ld a3, PT_R7(sp) + ld a4, PT_R8(sp) + ld a5, PT_R9(sp) jalr t2 li t0, -EMAXERRNO - 1 # error? -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
