On Wed, 2003-11-19 16:29:43 -0800, David Daney <ddaney@avtrex.com> wrote in message <3FBC0AF7.90600@avtrex.com>: > Ralf Baechle wrote: > >On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 05:40:31PM -0800, David Daney wrote: > Which options have other people used with gcc 3.3.1 with good results? It's a question of what you call "good results". If there are bugs in the kernel sources which only show up with a really aggressive HEAD compiler, then IMHO it's a good result to see the compiled kernel crash, just because there actually *is* a bug. Companies however tend to accept a slower/more bloated/whatever software (produced by an older compiler) in order not to start hunting down the remaining (and possibly hard to find) bugs... MfG, JBG -- Jan-Benedict Glaw jbglaw@lug-owl.de . +49-172-7608481 "Eine Freie Meinung in einem Freien Kopf | Gegen Zensur | Gegen Krieg fuer einen Freien Staat voll Freier Bürger" | im Internet! | im Irak! ret = do_actions((curr | FREE_SPEECH) & ~(NEW_COPYRIGHT_LAW | DRM | TCPA));
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
