Hi all: I'm currently trying to increase performance on our PMC-Sierra RM5231 system by taking advantage of the MIPS IV ISA. This processor has a 32-bit address bus interface with 64-bit GPRs, so I guess that the choice of -mabi=n32 is ideal for this processor. Why is it that the Linux kernel defaults to -mcpu=r5000 -mips2 for the 52XX? Wouldn't there be good reasons to use the enhancements present in the MIPS IV instruction set? I've tried modifying the mips Makefile so that the Nevada adds the cflags -mabi=n32 -mcpu=r5000 -mips4. I also modified asm/unistd.h so that __NR_sigreturn is defined for the case where _MIPS_SIM == _MIPS_SIM_NABI32. Unfortunately, I get link errors: (gcc 3.2.3) arch/mips/kernel/kernel.o(.data+0x4240): undefined reference to `sys_stat64' arch/mips/kernel/kernel.o(.data+0x4244): undefined reference to `sys_lstat64' arch/mips/kernel/kernel.o(.data+0x4248): undefined reference to `sys_fstat64' drivers/ide/idedriver.o(.data.init+0x8): undefined reference to `init_setup_it8172' The goal is that I want to be able to execute MIPS IV or MIPS III instructions in user mode, since the profiling program that I'm using is based in userspace and does not measure kernel performance. I already have measured performance using MIPS I binaries. Under a -mips1-compiled uClibc/busybox root filesystem, I tried executing -mips2, -mips3, and -mips4 binaries -- but it seemed that the ELF interpreter was unable to recognize them as valid ELF files (resulting in a shell 'Syntax Error'). After doing some digging, I found some documentation on SGI's website about different ABI levels: http://www.parallab.uib.no/SGI_bookshelves/SGI_Developer/books/MproCplrDbx_TG/sgi_html/ch06.html#Z70233 Here, I read that the OS, my libraries, and, of course, the application must support the ABI of my choice. So, this takes me to my second question: does Linux support the n32 ABI? How do I enable this support, so that it is possible to take advantage of MIPS IV instructions? Is there a book or FAQ that can answer questions such as these? Thank you very much for any help. Regards, Jeff -- Jeffrey Baitis <baitisj@evolution.com>