On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > Is it OK for other PCI systems? > > Yes, I think so. Those two functions seem to have migrated in from > pci-hplj.c; they can't possibly compile, since they use constants only > defined in that file. Then the snippet should probably get removed altogether. > > Why do you want these suffixes? They don't work for assembly sources. > > Because otherwise uses of XKPHYS in a 32-bit kernel generate noisy > warnings. I don't remember where it was offhand. Wrap it in > __ASSEMBLY__ if you like. Hmm, but is there any use for XKPHYS, etc. in a 32-bit kernel at all? The address cannot effectively be used anyway. -- + Maciej W. Rozycki, Technical University of Gdansk, Poland + +--------------------------------------------------------------+ + e-mail: macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl, PGP key available +
