Re: load/store address overflow on binutils 2.14

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Aug 2003, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> 
> > Produces the expected output. So it is actually an implementation
> > bug in binutils, which isn't fixable for 2.14 and earlier, because
> > those have to remain at K&R C level. The K&R requirement was only
> > recenly loosened.
> 
>  Strangely enough, the Atsushi's code builds just fine with 2.13.2.1.

The test in binutils it stumbled over was added later.


Thiemo


[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux