Re: load/store address overflow on binutils 2.14

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> On Fri, 8 Aug 2003 05:07:05 +0200, Thiemo Seufer <ica2_ts@csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> said:
>> The b.S is just one line "lw $2, 0x80000000".
Thiemo> Using 0xffffffff80000000 is a really ugly workaround for it.
Thiemo> Seems like the constant isn't properly sign-extended inernally
Thiemo> by the assembler.

Yes the workaround works.  But I modified binutils (just remove the
checking code) instead of changing many constant definitions in my
programs.  For now it is enough for me.  Thank you.
---
Atsushi Nemoto


[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux