On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 09:58:08AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > Well, I was wondering because the code in arch/mips/pci/ops-nile4.c which > > was extraced from the lasat code is completly different from > > ddb5xxx/ddb5074/pci_ops.c, so it's hard to extract the commonc code into > > a shared file. > > If you know the chip, they are actually quite similar :-) > > The differences between the Lasat and the DDB code are these: > - The Lasat code checks the PCI error registers to detect the presence of PCI > devices, while the DDB code doesn't, > - The Lasat code is limited to 8 PCI devices on bus 0, while the DDB code > uses a different access scheme to access the extra devices, > - The DDB code uses abstraction functions to access the Nile 4 registers, > while the Lasat code accesses the registers directly. Time to cleanup that mess also then. Does anybody still care about the DDB5074? I was just told somebody tried it and it didn't boot into userspace ... Ralf
