Re: do_IRQ query

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 01:16:51PM -0700, Ranjan Parthasarathy wrote:
> Is it safe to call do_IRQ directly inside interrupt handlers without doing a irq_enter. I have seen ksoftirqd_CPUX crashes when I call the do_IRQ routines directly instead of the following sequence.
> 
> irq_enter()
> do_IRQ
> irq_exit()
>

This is not right.  irq_enter()/irq_exit() is already called in 
handle_IRQ_event(), which in turn is called by do_IRQ().  YOu 
don't need this yourself.  

The rest of do_IRQ() code is protected by closing interrupts.

Something must be wrong in your system.  If you show the crash message,
we might be able to tell more.

> Some code use it while some do not. The timer code in arch/mips/kernel/time.c uses it in ll_timer_interrupt. Some ports call this function directly in their interrupt handlers.

Those ll_timer_xxx functions are alternative routes (fast ones) to
do_IRQ(), and therefore it needs to protect itself by calling
irq_enter()/irq_exit().

Jun


[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux