On Fri, 23 May 2003, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> On Fri, 23 May 2003, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > Hmm, what tree is it against? I can't see code matching these hunks in
> > > our tree at linux-mips.org.
> >
> > Check out the 2.4.x branch. I did verify that all patches apply.
>
> Being much surprised I've double checked this before replying, both a
> nightly snapshot at my local system here and directly at
> ftp.linux-mips.org. I'm using a branch tagged as "linux_2_4". AFAIK, it
> is *the* 2.4 branch. And AFAIK, it is the only branch that is actively
> maintained these days.
>
> Also I recall the discussion on the BD issue on these chips once, but I
> can't recall any results of it going into the CVS.
Sorry, my fault. My `clean' Linux/MIPS CVS tree wasn't as clean as I thought.
So please ignore.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
