Re: lwl-lwr

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mer, 2003-05-21 at 01:34, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> > of the base MIPS instruction set.  If one wants to live without them, 
> > one can either rig a compiler to emit multi-instruction sequences instead 
> > of lwr/lwl to do the appropriate shifts and masks (which is slower on all 

This would seem the sane approach. 

> Technically you're right ...  In reality lwl/lwr are covered by US patent
> 4,814,976 which would also cover a software implementation.  So unless MIPS
> grants a license for the purpose of emulation in the Linux kernel ...

They would need to grant a license for general GPL use, the GPL itself
does not intend to allow other restrictions that would make the code non
free. There are a billion examples of prior art for software fixing up
of exceptions and software emulation of alignment fixups however.

Maybe MIPS can clarify their position officially.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux