On Fri, May 16, 2003 at 11:51:47PM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > SI_TKILL is new in glibc and not yet ported to mips. Well, the kernel's include/asm-mips/siginfo.h defines SI_KILL as -6 while glibc defines SI_ASYNCNL as -6. Is there a reason for this or is this just a typo, all other architectures define the later as -60. If it's a typo i'd like to keep this in sync with other architectures: Index: sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/mips/bits/siginfo.h =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/glibc/libc/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/mips/bits/siginfo.h,v retrieving revision 1.9 diff -u -p -u -r1.9 siginfo.h --- sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/mips/bits/siginfo.h 5 Dec 2002 00:23:59 -0000 1.9 +++ sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/mips/bits/siginfo.h 20 May 2003 12:57:08 -0000 @@ -119,8 +119,10 @@ typedef struct siginfo signals. */ enum { - SI_ASYNCNL = -6, /* Sent by asynch name lookup completion. */ + SI_ASYNCNL = -60, /* Sent by asynch name lookup completion. */ # define SI_ASYNCNL SI_ASYNCNL + SI_TKILL = -6, /* Sent by tkill. */ +# define SI_TKILL SI_TKILL SI_SIGIO, /* Sent by queued SIGIO. */ # define SI_SIGIO SI_SIGIO SI_MESGQ, /* Sent by real time mesq state change. */ Regards, -- Guido