Re: -mcpu vs. binutils 2.13.90.0.18

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> On Wed, 14 May 2003, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> 
> > >  Of course the choice of the default should be configurable (for binutils
> > > it probably already is
> > 
> > It isn't, and probably will never be. Of course you could introduce
> > just another configuration, with the bfd vector of your choice as
> > default.
> 
>  Hmm, I would assume "mipsn32*-linux" defaults to n32 and "mips64*-linux" 
> -- to (n)64.  It isn't the case, indeed.

IMHO it's not particularily useful to have both of these. I assume a n64
capable system will always implement n32 also, for better performance
and less memory consumption, and the majority of applications will run
as n32. IOW, there's little need for a n64-defaulting configuration.

But IIRC we disagree about this point.


Thiemo


[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux