Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: [snip] > > > Just for completeness: I had to use: > > > GCCFLAGS += -mabi=32 -march=r4600 -mtune=r4600 -Wa,--trap > > > to make gcc-3.3 happy (note the 32 instead of o32). > > > > Yes, IIRC 64 vs. n64 has the same problem. > > That's not quite the same: 64 is o64, n64 is n64. I don't think so (There's -mabi=o64). Otherwise I would have built all my NewABI 64bit Executables as o64 without noticing ever. :-) > GCC's never called the 32-bit ABI "o32". True, but it might be clearer if it did. Thiemo
