On Mon, Apr 07, 2003 at 03:18:25PM +0200, Hartvig Ekner wrote: > I have no idea whether what I did was correct, but at least it is no less incorrect than the code currently > in there, which coredumps now for some reason (I wonder why it never crashed before). The test-bit macro > expects a bit-number, and not a mask which it is given in the current code. > > So while fixing this, I also used the normal cpu_data macro for the cpu_has_watch() macro, instead of > looking at CPU(0). The plan was to make the options field a bitfield like on i386 but I changed my mind because we still have plenty of unused bits left. I've put a fix into CVS. The patch also replaces all the manual bit tests of the options field with feature test macros. Ralf
