Re: -mcpu vs. binutils 2.13.90.0.18

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Thiemo Seufer <ica2_ts@csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de>
Subject: Re: -mcpu vs. binutils 2.13.90.0.18
From: Guido Guenther <agx@sigxcpu.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 02:25:40 +0100
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
In-reply-to: <20030319001652.GB19189@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de>
Mail-followup-to: Guido Guenther <agx@sigxcpu.org>,Thiemo Seufer <ica2_ts@csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de>,linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <20030318154155.GF2613@bogon.ms20.nix> <20030318160303.GN13122@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> <20030318174241.GG2613@bogon.ms20.nix> <20030318190841.GO13122@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> <20030318232454.GA19990@bogon.ms20.nix> <20030319001652.GB19189@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: Mutt/1.4i

On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 01:16:52AM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> Yes, this should work. You can leave the -mtune out, since it defaults
> to the value of -march anyway.
Thanks.
 -- Guido

References:
- -mcpu vs. binutils 2.13.90.0.18
  - From: Guido Guenther
- Re: -mcpu vs. binutils 2.13.90.0.18
  - From: Thiemo Seufer
- Re: -mcpu vs. binutils 2.13.90.0.18
  - From: Guido Guenther
- Re: -mcpu vs. binutils 2.13.90.0.18
  - From: Thiemo Seufer
- Re: -mcpu vs. binutils 2.13.90.0.18
  - From: Guido Guenther
- Re: -mcpu vs. binutils 2.13.90.0.18
  - From: Thiemo Seufer

Prev by Date: Re: -mcpu vs. binutils 2.13.90.0.18
Next by Date: PCI status error 0x2a80..
Previous by thread: Re: -mcpu vs. binutils 2.13.90.0.18
Next by thread: Re: -mcpu vs. binutils 2.13.90.0.18
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux MIPS Home] [LKML Archive] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux] [Git] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCSI] [Linux Hams]

Powered by Linux