Suggestions and corrections are welcome. I'm not an ABI/binutils expert. FYI, I let Ralf eyeball this before checking it in. Kip "Maciej W. Rozycki" wrote: > > On Thu, 20 Feb 2003 kwalker@linux-mips.org wrote: > > > Modified files: > > include/asm-mips64: Tag: linux_2_4 a.out.h elf.h processor.h > > arch/mips64/kernel: Tag: linux_2_4 process.c signal.c > > > > Log message: > > Represent ABI (o32,n32,n64) in thread mflags using 2 bits: > > MF_32BIT_REGS, MF_32BIT_ADDR. > > Why do you assume no ABI set for ELF32 means n32? Historically it means > o32 and arch/mips64/kernel/binfmt_elfo32.c treats it as such. Also a > brief study of binutils reveals the interpretation is the same for IRIX > which does not handle the EF_MIPS_ABI mask. > > -- > + Maciej W. Rozycki, Technical University of Gdansk, Poland + > +--------------------------------------------------------------+ > + e-mail: macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl, PGP key available +
