On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 11:38:39AM +1100, Andrew Clausen wrote: > There is currently a check that the ramdisk image resides at a sane > memory address, below "max_pfn". However, max_pfn isn't initialized > (and apparently isn't relevant) for ip27. The only assignments to > max_pfn lie inside #ifndef CONFIG_SGI_IP27. > > Therefore, this test is bogus, so here's a patch to > #ifndef CONFIG_SGI_IP27 it. > > This patch applies cleanly on 2.4.x and 2.5.x (at a different offset). No winner in a beauty contest but I think it's ok until we sort the underlying NUMA issues which we'd have to do anyway at some point - more ccNUMA stuff will come eventually ... Ralf
