On Fri, 2003-02-14 at 04:33, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
> +}
> +
> +int smp_call_function (void (*func) (void *info), void *info, int retry, int wait)
> +{
> + return smp_call_function_on_cpu(func, info, wait, cpu_online_map);
> }
IIRC, the semantics of smp_call_function() are to call the function on
all other cpus. So shouldn't this be
return smp_call_function_on_cpu(func, info, wait, cpu_online_map & ~(1<<smp_processor_id()));
?
Also, maybe you were planning to do this in a future patch, but
shouldn't smp_call_function() be moved to non-arch-specific code, given
this change?
-Justin
