>>>>> "geert" == Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> writes: geert> On Mon, 27 Jan 2003, Vivien Chappelier wrote: >> On Fri, 24 Jan 2003, Ralf Baechle wrote: >> > Most of what your patch does is undoing an accidental commit of a signal >> > rework that wasn't yet supposed to go out. >> >> Maybe.. but current version is still wrong :) The type of the sig >> array in the 32-bit compatibility struct sigset_t32 must be 32bit long, >> i.e. unsigned int not unsigned long. >> And I think unsigned describes the data better than signed, but that's a >> matter of taste :) (coherent with the choice in asm-mips/signal.h). geert> Why not make it u32? Nahh, that will make it clear indeed to stupid's like me :p Later ,Juan. -- In theory, practice and theory are the same, but in practice they are different -- Larry McVoy
