On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Andrew Clausen wrote: > Shouldn't those two long's be replaced with u64 and u32 > respectively? Is the second struct really meant to be twice the > size the first? They should be the same size, otherwise sys32_rt_sigsuspend and sys32_rt_sigaction will return EINVAL. As the comment says: /* XXX: Don't preclude handling different sized sigset_t's. */ I've posted a patch to fix that earlier this month (Monday 13 Jan 2003 "[2.5 PATCH] signal handling"). BTW, anyone working on mips64 2.5 kernel should have a look at my patch set (http://www.linux-mips.org/~glaurung/O2/linux-2.5.47/patches-2.5.47.tar.gz) for patches named "linux-mips-*.diff" as they might be relevant for other machines than just the O2, and the more they are tested the better. A README is provided to explain briefly what they (try to) fix. regards, Vivien.
