On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 11:20:02AM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote:
> to be consistent with everybody else, test_bit should return a
> int. Notice that it only returns 0/1, not a big deal.
I'm using below patch instead.
Ralf
Index: include/asm-mips/bitops.h
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvs/linux/include/asm-mips/bitops.h,v
retrieving revision 1.21.2.9
diff -u -r1.21.2.9 bitops.h
--- include/asm-mips/bitops.h 5 Dec 2002 03:25:20 -0000 1.21.2.9
+++ include/asm-mips/bitops.h 20 Dec 2002 12:54:10 -0000
@@ -582,9 +582,9 @@
* @nr: bit number to test
* @addr: Address to start counting from
*/
-static __inline__ int test_bit(int nr, volatile void *addr)
+static inline int test_bit(int nr, volatile void *addr)
{
- return ((1UL << (nr & 31)) & (((const unsigned int *) addr)[nr >> 5])) != 0;
+ return 1UL & (((const volatile unsigned long *) addr)[nr >> SZLONG_LOG] >> (nr & SZLONG_MASK));
}
/*
Index: include/asm-mips64/bitops.h
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvs/linux/include/asm-mips64/bitops.h,v
retrieving revision 1.15.2.10
diff -u -r1.15.2.10 bitops.h
--- include/asm-mips64/bitops.h 5 Dec 2002 03:25:20 -0000 1.15.2.10
+++ include/asm-mips64/bitops.h 20 Dec 2002 12:54:12 -0000
@@ -302,9 +302,9 @@
* @nr: bit number to test
* @addr: Address to start counting from
*/
-static inline unsigned long test_bit(int nr, volatile void * addr)
+static inline int test_bit(int nr, volatile void * addr)
{
- return 1UL & (((volatile unsigned long *) addr)[nr >> 6] >> (nr & 0x3f));
+ return 1UL & (((const volatile unsigned long *) addr)[nr >> SZLONG_LOG] >> (nr & SZLONG_MASK));
}
/*
