Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org> writes: > Surely we can't... Remember what EF_MIPS_ARCH says: it's actually what > we call ISA level elsewhere! I just spent a day beating on this and > settled for untagged instead of correctly-tagged binaries; I was trying > to built SB-1 binaries (that's EF_MIPS_MACH of EF_MIPS_MACH_SB1) for a > 32-bit userland (that's EF_MIPS_ARCH_2). Not just E_MIPS_ABI_O32, but > actually -mips2 code. I'm not sure what you want from a MIPS II SB-1 binary, though. Does it mean that you can't use instructions that are defined in the MIPS32 ISA but not the MIPS II one? But you can use the SB-1-specific instructions (i.e. those not defined in the MIPS64 ISA)? Richard
