On Mon, 7 Oct 2002, Kevin D. Kissell wrote: > That's probably going to be a more reliable design, > though I would still consider leaving the TLB refill handler > untouched and counting on the fact that k1 must contain > a non-lethal EntryLo value on return from the exception. Well, there is a "nop" just before the "eret" in all R4k-style TLB exception handlers. I see no problem to use the slot for explicit clobbering of k0 or k1 with a single instruction like "li" or "lui". -- + Maciej W. Rozycki, Technical University of Gdansk, Poland + +--------------------------------------------------------------+ + e-mail: macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl, PGP key available +
