Hi, On 14 Oct 2002, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > > If gcc just emits > > > bne $2,$0,$L7493 > > j $L2 > > IIRC, that's exactly what GCC will emit if you don't tell it to try to > fill delay slots. If it tries to fill delay slots and fails, I doubt > the assembler is going to succeed at that. I think that isn't hj's point. He wanta gas to take advantage of relaxation, and gcc is hindering that for no good reason. I admit I have no idea of Mips, though, so I don't know if relaxation somehow is depending on delay slot filling at all ;-) Ciao, Michael.
