On Fri, 2002-10-04 at 15:17, Kevin D. Kissell wrote: > Which is safe, simple, and efficient, but does seem to have the property > that there's a "cursed" page in the system that can be randomly allocated > and which will be curiously slow on memcopy(). That might or might not > be a problem in the embedded application space. Im curious why you think that. Its the same speed for all pages and all copies. If anything it is more efficient because we don't drag 320 bytes of crap across the bus that we dont actually want anyway.
