Re: LOADADDR and low physical addresses?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 02:13:08PM -0700, Matthew Dharm wrote:
> Yes, the having two devices at the same physical address might be a
> problem, but one I _might_ be able to work around.  Not only do I have
> a large bank of SDRAM, but I also have a small bank of on-chip SRAM.
> 
> So I'm thinking that the map will go (starting from 0) like this:
> on-chip SRAM, control registers, main memory
> 
> And this is where I think the add_memory_region() magic might need to
> happen.  Do I need to add the on-chip SRAM and control registers using
> add_memory_region()?  

I don't think you have to.  I *think* it works if you don't.  Not sure
know if you actuall do add.

> Is it going to be okay to have a large and
> mis-aligned bank of SDRAM?

That should be ok.

Jun


[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux