On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 04:58:35PM +0200, Ralf Baechle wrote: > On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 10:50:51AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > > > So any comments? > > > > Well, I think 2.13's a good idea, but it's very new. I'd say that was > > acceptable as long as you're looking at MIPS64 only, not at MIPS32. > > Such considerations have kept us back at antique levels of binutils. And > juggling with several different versions for userland, and two kernel > flavours is evil ... I have no problems with binutils 2.13.90.0.4 on Linux/mips. I rebuild everything, from kernel to rpms, for Linux/mipsel with it. They seem to run fine. H.J.