On Tue, 20 Aug 2002, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: > Please accept the patch (from my previous mail). I'm using it now for > two days, and I've got one mail telling me that it works for its sender. Ugh, this should be a separate set of functions selected at the run time. It should be fairly trivial to rewrite it this way (best done with processor-specific functions expanded from common templates for ease of maintenance), but the size of the resulting interrupt masking window is unacceptable. A more finegrained implementation is really desireable, with an interrupt enable window every page or so, but your proposal should be fair enough for the sake of usability once rewritten as I suggested. -- + Maciej W. Rozycki, Technical University of Gdansk, Poland + +--------------------------------------------------------------+ + e-mail: macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl, PGP key available +
