On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > I use HEAD. The change from CVS Revision 1.61 to 1.62 was dropping > the tty.h include. Apparently a 2.5 cleanup. Well, the trunk is outdated -- it's 2.5.1, while the rest of the world uses 2.5.24. I'm using 2.4 for development, too, and I only syntactically port changes to the trunk. Adding a local declaration is the worst that can happen and it should not be used if at all possible (sometimes it's not, but the cases are rare). What if the interface changes? The correct fix is to include the appropriate header either in the header that depends on it or in the sources that include it. I prefer the former, but it may sometimes lead to circular dependencies because of a few Linux headers being too coarse. -- + Maciej W. Rozycki, Technical University of Gdansk, Poland + +--------------------------------------------------------------+ + e-mail: macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl, PGP key available +
