Re: 3 questions about linux-2.4.18 and R3000

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 3 Jun 2002, Ralf Baechle wrote:

> >  For MIPS64 they definitely do not work, OTOH, including the N32 ABI.
> 
> Are they good enough to build 64-bit kernels?

 Not yet.  For N32 gas complains about 64-bit immediates and fails.  For
64 there are a few problems I'm currently resolving, but the kernel links.
As N32 is low priority for me, I'll get 64 fixed first, at least to the
point non-PIC static executables such as Linux work.  PIC and dynamic
linking are next on my to-do list. 

 I'm working on 2.12.90, though, as the MIPS/ELF backend was positively
but extensively restructured, so the ultimate target is 2.13.  For plain
MIPS 2.12.90 seem OK. 

-- 
+  Maciej W. Rozycki, Technical University of Gdansk, Poland   +
+--------------------------------------------------------------+
+        e-mail: macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl, PGP key available        +


[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux