Ralf Baechle wrote: > On Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 01:11:18AM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > > > > Wonderful. Due to the hackish way we're using to build 64-bit kernels > > > for the currently supported targets we don't run into this problems, > > > there are no R_MIPS_HIGHEST relocs ever. > > > > Well, for my I2 Impact I do. :-) I hope to get it running again with > > the current kernel (plus my patches) in the next days. > > Interesting. So you don't place the kernel into any of the 32-bit > compatibility address spaces on that machine? Load address is 0xa800000020002000 (and my diff against CVS > 300k). :-) I'm busy because of Linuxtag now, I think I have time to provide some parts of this in about two weeks. Thiemo
