Re: head.S and init_task.c vs addinitrd

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 15 Apr 2002, Guido Guenther wrote:

> Are you telling me the only reason for the changes in init_task.c/head.S
> were made to break the elf2ecoff/addinitrd "hack"? Where exactly was
> there a hack in head.S/init_task.c. Please point me to the line of code
> since I don't understand enough about the kernel to see it.

 I meant it stopped working because it is an ugly hack.  It is too fragile
to work in all cases. 

> That's 2.5 stuff. We should not break expected behavior in 2.4.

 Agreed.

-- 
+  Maciej W. Rozycki, Technical University of Gdansk, Poland   +
+--------------------------------------------------------------+
+        e-mail: macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl, PGP key available        +


[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux