Theodore Tso wrote: > > And just to be clear ---- although in the past I've been really > annoyed when glibc has made what I've considered to be arbitrary > changes which have screwed ABI, compile-time, or link-time > compatibility, and have spoken out against it --- in this particular > case, I consider the fault to be purely the fault of the kernel > developers, so there's no need having the glibc folks get all > defensive.... So... Does the kernel need fixing? If so, what would you recommend? -
