On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 06:02:37AM +0100, Ralf Baechle wrote: > On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 11:47:44PM -0500, Jay Carlson wrote: > > > Ralf is right that the kernel emulator is the supported route. But if > > you're willing to go to the trouble of building everything from scratch, > > this does work. > > It's really a major pain. Softfp isn't defined in the ABI which assumes > an FPU is available. As the result there is no provision for mixing > softfp and fp-less code. > > Something for the binutils to-do list - ld should make mixing hard-fp > and soft-fp binaries impossible. Or we could see if it is possible to define the ABIs in such a way that they can call each other... I don't immediately see a problem. The only code that will clobber FP registers is FP code. -- Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
