On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 08:32:50PM +0100, Johannes Stezenbach wrote: > > It's an ECOFF specific optimization that just has been forward ported into > > the ELF world. And what does this have to do with SGI anyway? > > I was wondering who you speak for when you say "we don't > support foobar", and your email is @oss.sgi.com. You seem to be unaware that half of oss users are ex-sgi employees :-) > I was just trying to decode the meaning of what you said. > Like, did you mean "I don't care about it" or "The tools are > totally broken and you have to go along way to use it"? > > The global data optimization would fit dietlibc's goal > of as-small-as-possible, statically linked binaries. But > from what you said I gather I would have to fix gcc and > binutils first. See also my other email about the status of -G. Ralf
