Re: set_io_port_base()?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 06:05:21PM -0800, Matthew Dharm wrote:

> If it works as I think it does, then is the code in
> linux/arch/mips/gt64120/momenco_ocelot/setup.c correct?  Specifically,
> it calls ioremap() and then calls set_io_port_base() with a very
> strange value -- it's the value from ioremap()

> modified by the I/O physical address base...
  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

I was reading too fast and missed that part.

> That doesn't look right to me... or I just don't quite understand how
> this is supposed to work.

That's definately looks fishy.  Another crime people keep comitting is using
the same address space for both I/O memory and the base address of the
port space.

  Ralf


[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux