Re: gcc include strangeness

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 11 Feb 2002, Johannes Stezenbach wrote:

> I would certainly be interested in getting my hands on those
> patches. Do you mind if I ask why they did not go into
> gcc-2_95-branch CVS?

 RPM packages are available at my site --
"ftp://ftp.ds2.pg.gda.pl/pub/macro/";.  They used to be recommended tools
for glibc 2.2 for MIPS/Linux before gcc 3.0 was released. 

 As to why they did not go into the CVS?  Well, I wasn't aware gcc 2.95.x
was maintained until after 2.95.3 was released (but patches that were
relevant either went in to 2.96 or were rejected).  And now we have 3.x.

 If 2.95.x is still maintained and you feel the patches would be useful
for inclusion, feel free to commit them.  The change log in the spec file
contains descriptions of the purpose of every patch. 

  Maciej

-- 
+  Maciej W. Rozycki, Technical University of Gdansk, Poland   +
+--------------------------------------------------------------+
+        e-mail: macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl, PGP key available        +


[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux