Re: pgd_init() Patch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2002-01-28 at 11:53, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2002, Phil Thompson wrote:
> > - USER_PTRS_PER_PGD is defined as TASK_SIZE/PGDIR_SIZE. However,
> > because, TASK_SIZE is actually defined as one less that the maximum task
>            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > size there is a rounding error that means that USER_PTRS_PER_PGD works
>   ^^^^
> > out at 511 rather than 512. This means that entries 511 and 1023 of
> > swapper_pg_dir don't get initialised.
> > 
> > The corresponding mips64 code has only the first call to pgd_init() and
> > each implementation of pgd_init() initialises PTRS_PER_PGD entries,
> > where PTRS_PER_PGD is simple defined as 1024.
> > 
> > The attached patch applies the mips64 approach to the mips code.
> > 
> > Should USER_PTRS_PER_PGD be defined as (TASK_SIZE/PGDIR_SIZE) + 1?
> 
> You mean ((TASK_SIZE)+1)/PGDIR_SIZE?

Or how about:

#define USER_PTRS_PER_PGD      ((TASK_SIZE-1)/PGDIR_SIZE + 1)


The above patch fixes a rather serious memory leak.  When a parent
process forks a large number of children and then it exits before the
children exit, we lose one page per child. I was able to narrow down the
problem and reproduce it with the attached program.  Ralf has the fix,
but was examining related issues before applying the patch.

Pete

 
#include <signal.h>

#define NUM_TSK 200
int main()
{
	int i, lastp;
	int pids[NUM_TSK];

	printf("mypid %d\n", getpid());
	for (i=0; i<NUM_TSK; i++) {
		switch (pids[i] = fork()) {
			case -1:
				printf("fork failed, lastp %d\n", lastp);
				goto killall;
			case 0:
				sleep(4);
				return 0;
				break;
			default:
				lastp = i;
		}
	}

killall:
	return 0;
}

[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux