The Markham board (Korva/VR41xx variant) which I'm trying to get
submitted, has a PCI problem. It doesn't allow a PCI device to
see all the DRAM. DMA-able data must be in a special 4MB range,
which is currently set at 0x01c00000 (the last 4MB of a 32MB
system). SKB's must be allocated within this area for a
(say, Ethernet) PCI device to access. There appears to be no way
to tell kmalloc(), used in alloc_skb(), to allocate memory from
any special address range.
The pci_{alloc,free}_consistent() routines do the right thing.
Hence the following hack to linux/net/core/skbuff.c.
Any suggestions?
Geoff
--
Geoffrey Espin espin@idiom.com
--
--- skbuff.c.ORIG Tue Aug 7 08:30:50 2001
+++ skbuff.c Mon Dec 17 13:46:40 2001
@@ -62,6 +62,12 @@
#include <asm/uaccess.h>
#include <asm/system.h>
+#if defined(CONFIG_NEC_MARKHAM_PCI)
+#warning PCI ALLOC: see linux/arch/mips/markham/pci_fixup.c
+extern void *pci_alloc_consistent(int, int, dma_addr_t *);
+extern void pci_free_consistent(int,int, void *, int);
+#endif
+
int sysctl_hot_list_len = 128;
static kmem_cache_t *skbuff_head_cache;
@@ -187,6 +193,23 @@
/* Get the DATA. Size must match skb_add_mtu(). */
size = SKB_DATA_ALIGN(size);
+#if defined(CONFIG_NEC_MARKHAM_PCI)
+ /* NEC Markham: see skb_release_data() also */
+
+ /*
+ * Markham doesn't allow a PCI device to see all the RAM.
+ * DMAable data must be on this special 4MB range, which
+ * is currently set at 0x01c00000. SKB buffers must also
+ * be allocated within this area for a PCI device to
+ * access. There is no way to tell kmalloc() to allocate
+ * memory from any special address range. So we do it on
+ * our own.
+ * Dai, Wed Jun 13 19:34:23 PDT 2001
+ */
+ if (1)
+ data = (u8 *)pci_alloc_consistent(0,size + sizeof(struct skb_shared_info), NULL);
+ else
+#endif
data = kmalloc(size + sizeof(struct skb_shared_info), gfp_mask);
if (data == NULL)
goto nodata;
@@ -286,6 +309,12 @@
if (skb_shinfo(skb)->frag_list)
skb_drop_fraglist(skb);
+#if defined(CONFIG_NEC_MARKHAM_PCI)
+ /* NEC Markham: see allock_skb() also */
+ if (1)
+ pci_free_consistent(0,0,skb->head,0);
+ else
+#endif
kfree(skb->head);
}
}
@@ -505,6 +534,24 @@
size = (skb->end - skb->head + expand);
size = SKB_DATA_ALIGN(size);
+
+#if defined(CONFIG_NEC_MARKHAM_PCI)
+ /* NEC Markham: see skb_release_data() also */
+
+ /*
+ * Markham doesn't allow a PCI device to see all the RAM.
+ * DMAable data must be on this special 4MB range, which
+ * is currently set at 0x01c00000. SKB buffers must also
+ * be allocated within this area for a PCI device to
+ * access. There is no way to tell kmalloc() to allocate
+ * memory from any special address range. So we do it on
+ * our own.
+ * Dai, Wed Jun 13 19:34:23 PDT 2001
+ */
+ if (1)
+ data = (u8 *)pci_alloc_consistent(0,size + sizeof(struct skb_shared_info), NULL);
+ else
+#endif
data = kmalloc(size + sizeof(struct skb_shared_info), gfp_mask);
if (data == NULL)
return -ENOMEM;
@@ -512,7 +559,6 @@
/* Copy entire thing */
if (skb_copy_bits(skb, -headerlen, data, headerlen+skb->len))
BUG();
-
/* Offset between the two in bytes */
offset = data - skb->head;
@@ -627,6 +673,23 @@
size = SKB_DATA_ALIGN(size);
+#if defined(CONFIG_NEC_MARKHAM_PCI)
+ /* NEC Markham: see skb_release_data() also */
+
+ /*
+ * Markham doesn't allow a PCI device to see all the RAM.
+ * DMAable data must be on this special 4MB range, which
+ * is currently set at 0x01c00000. SKB buffers must also
+ * be allocated within this area for a PCI device to
+ * access. There is no way to tell kmalloc() to allocate
+ * memory from any special address range. So we do it on
+ * our own.
+ * Dai, Wed Jun 13 19:34:23 PDT 2001
+ */
+ if (1)
+ data = (u8 *)pci_alloc_consistent(0,size + sizeof(struct skb_shared_info), NULL);
+ else
+#endif
data = kmalloc(size + sizeof(struct skb_shared_info), gfp_mask);
if (data == NULL)
goto nodata;
